Descriptions of Dolls

The vendors sometimes give the dolls names. But I found they do not really fit. And I notice that they sometimes have the same doll under different names.

The names which they give are quite arbitrary. And so are those "backstories" which are quite annoying. For example that she is hot and has a big desire for cock. This is supposed to be sexy and should turn men on, but for me they actually turn me off. It is just a doll. I would rather know more technical details: exact dimensions, size of shoes, width of bust, waist, hip. This is sometimes missing.

What would be nice: a realistic estimate of age, to determine the maturity and the "MILF status" of the doll. I can estimate it myself, from looking at the face, but it would be nice to know if there was a certain design intent by the face manufacturers.

My personal preference: more mature MILF-like dolls. I personally cannot stand those child dolls which appear to be made for pedophiles. Is fine for them to use those, at least then they stay away from real children. 

I do dislike those childish faces, on small 140 cm bodies. I also do not like school girl dolls. Reminds me of those school girls I was dating when I was that age - absolute disaster!

No, those young girls without experience do not turn me on at all. I prefer a face that looks being at least of age 30. Can also be 40. Might also well preserved at 50. In real life, those more mature women do have bodies which sometimes show their age. But if they kept in shape, then they can look wonderful!

The doll bodies come in all varieties - which is great. Someone like a fatty, then this is fine. Can all be found. I prefer not too slim, especially I am not a fan of those extremely thin waists (around 50 cm) which then expand on top to a 90 cm bust or below to y 90+ hip. Too much contrast, looks ugly and unappealing to me. I am ok with a waist of 55 cm or 60 cm. And real clothing has size small indicating a waist of 60 cm. A very narrow slim body would have the cloths wobbling around the waist, without sitting tight. Not very appealing.

So yes, the classical 90-60-90 seems right. Bust not too intrusive, not too busty, otherwise looks ugly. Can be a bot less, e.g. 85 cm. Hip can be decent size, not soo slim. Upper thigh should have some volume, otherwise they look like storch legs.

Am quite looking forward to the doll I will receive tomorrow: reasonable height of 166 cm, makes her a bit slender and not as stocky as the most frequent 158 cm bodies. Body seems well proportioned, but unfortunately no data are given. C-cup is mentioned, sound about right. B-cup would be too small for my taste. Manufacturer of the doll is FireDoll. Head #43, looks friendly and nice. Her name is given as "Nina". Not sure that this name fits to her... I will decide on her name, once I have the doll here in my house.